In this study, selection and contents of the literatures are relevantly supported the study objectives. The flow of literature review are well organized in systematical order. The authors begin by discussing More specifically, research is diligent, systematic study that validates and improve exciting knowledge and develops new knowledge. Research results might be synthesized into evidences for use in nursing practice.
Thus, extensive research is needed to validate the knowledge. There are mainly two types of research: Quantitative research is a formal, objective, systematic process in which numerical data are used to obtain information about the world Burns and Grove, It is logical positivism, concise, objective, reductionistic, logistic and deductive.
It works on cause-and-effect relationships and theory-testing. Qualitative research is a systematic, subjective approach used to describe life experiences and give them meaning Munhall, It is broad, subjective, holistic, dialectic and inductive. It works on meaning, discovery, understanding and theory-development.
As per Polit and Hungler , research process can be described as below refer to phase 1, 2 and Formulating and delimiting the problem. This is the very first step in any scientific process. A research question is a statement of the specific query the researcher wants to answer, to address the research problem Polit, Beck and Hungler, The most common sources of research problems are experience, relevant literature, social issues, theory and external sources.
Reviewing the related literature. This is to help researcher to understand what is already known about a topic. It is a waste of time and money to conduct a research that the answer to the question is Return to Top of Research Article Critique.
Great strategies and one phenomenal tool to help you paraphrase and re-write material for outstanding papers right now. Click here to find out how. Com - All Rights Reserved. Results should be statistically analysed and presented in a way that the average reader of the journal will understand. Graphs and tables should be clear and promote clarity of the text.
Negative results are just as relevant as research that produces positive results but as mentioned previously may be omitted in publication due to editorial bias. This should show insight into the meaning and significance of the research findings. It should not introduce any new material, but should address how the aims of the study have been met.
The discussion should use previous research work and theoretical concepts as the context in which the new study can be interpreted. Any limitations of the study, including bias, should be clearly presented. You will need to evaluate whether the author has clearly interpreted the results of the study, or whether the results could be interpreted another way. These should be clearly stated and will only be valid if the study was reliable, valid and used a representative sample size. There may also be recommendations for further research.
These should be relevant to the study, be up to date, and should provide a comprehensive list of citations within the text. Undertaking a critique of a research article may seem challenging at first, but will help you to evaluate whether the article has relevance to your own practice and workplace. Reading a single article can act as a springboard into researching the topic more widely and aids in ensuring your nursing practice remains current and is supported by existing literature.
Sarah Vogel specialises in producing well researched articles in the field of health and medicine. The general structure of your critique should consist of a title page, abstract, body and references. When formatting the title page, you should indicate name of your paper and school, as well as your personal data. In-text citations should be made using the author-date system, which means that you only need to indicate name of the author, followed by the year of publication.
If you want to quote a certain part of the paper, you need to include the page name at the end. If you know how to write an article critique, you will easily complete the assignment not depending on its complexity and formatting peculiarities. Nowadays, in order to make high-quality paper, one needs to spend a lot of time to conduct extensive research to suite professor's wishes. Our experts in custom writing will save your time and make it for you with pleasure.
Leave your e-mail to learn more about them first! Send It To Me. How to Critique an Article Every day students get dozens of new assignments of all shapes and kinds, so it is more that simple to get lost in all of the rules and guidelines.
Here is a really good example of a scholary research critique written by a student in EDRS The student who submitted this paper last semester earned a on his critique.
How To Critique A Journal Article Sponsored by The Center for Teaching and Learning at UIS Last Edited 4/9/ Page 1 of 2 So your assignment is to critique a journal article.
Let’s briefly examine some basic pointers on how to perform a literature review. If you’ve managed to get your hands on peer-reviewed articles, then you may wonder why it is necessary for you to perform your own article critique. WRITING THE CRITIQUE Critical reviews for research are systematic. They begin at the title, and review each section until the reference list at the end. It is useful to ask yourself questions about the purpose of each component of the article, and whether it.
This article presents a framework nurses can use to read and critique a research article. A systematic approach to reading and critiquing a research article serves as a foundation for translating evidence into practice and policy. Every nurse can acquire this skill. Research Question / Hypothesis for Research Article Critique A clearly stated hypothesis includes the variables to be manipulated or measured, identifies the population to be examined, and indicates the proposed outcomes for the study.